March is Women's History Month! It's time to shine a spotlight on the ladies in our family trees. I'll be writing all month on women I've researched. I encourage all family history lovers to take the month to seek out the stories of our foremothers!
Our local genealogical society features the "Ancestor Question of the Month" in our newsletter. For the month of March one of the prompts was, "Which of your female ancestors witnessed a historic American event? What was it? What was her experience?"
I looked through my tree to find a female ancestor whose life intersected with an historic event. Since many of my women ancestors are still under researched, I can only image their experiences of events like the Civil War, the Great Depression, plagues, or natural disasters.
But I did light upon one ancestor who experienced not so much a historic event but a historical movement in the medical field.
I've written many times about my second great-grandmother Catherine (Kate) Ryan Gilbride (1855-1881). She was institutionalized in April 1877 for puerperal mania after the stillbirth of her second child. She and her husband, Michael Gilbride (1855-1908), were indigent, and so Kate's fate was sealed by the Directors of the Poor of Providence, and she was sent to Danville Asylum in Montour County, Pennsylvania, for care.1>/sup>
 |
| Patient at Bedlam, London. |
When I first discovered that Kate was institutionalized, my immediate thought was that she was simply warehoused in horrible conditions, with terrible food, shoddy accommodations. I wondered is she was restrained like those pictured in the drawing (left) of the infamous Bedlam asylum in London, or did she endure treatments that would send a shiver down our spines today?
But while at Danville Asylum, Kate experienced a very new form of treatment for those with mental illness—the Moral Treatment, championed in the U.S. by Dr. Thomas Story Kirkbride. Originally developed in Europe, this new method focused on providing a calm, soothing environment for patients, theorizing that this would help them regain their mental health.
2
Rather than cells, patients lived in dormitory-like wings in a beautiful new facility, tastefully decorated with carpets, curtains, plants, and artwork. Indoor and outdoor activities were offered, including chapel, entertainments, and the ability to experience nature in the asylum's pastoral setting.3 They ate wholesome, nutritious food. The use of physical restraints, jackets, or cuffs was frowned upon until or unless absolutely necessary. Medical staff cared for the patients' needs and prescribed various medicines to help with their illnesses.
 |
| Danville Asylum, Montour County, Pennsylvania. |
Without Danville, Kate might have faced a very different fate. Before the Moral Treatment, mentally ill individuals were often housed in local jails or poor houses which were ill-equipped to care for their multitude of needs. The Moral Treatment opened the doors to new thinking about how the those with mental illness were treated as well as where they lived. Patients were removed from their homes and housed in a new type of building especially designed for their needs by Dr. Kirkbride.
"The design of the asylum can be described as having a cheerful and
comfortable appearance with ornamented grounds including trees, shrubs,
and flowering plants. The attractiveness of the asylum is meant to
impress upon the patient a desire to reside in the building. The basic
form of the building consists of a central structure flanked by two
wings, resembling the anatomy of a bat."4
"Dr. Kirkbride believed that management of the asylum was essential in
curing mental illness. He thought that removing an individual from the
outside world and immersing them in a more ordered world would revert
them to sanity. The individual would be free of the over stimulation and
stresses thought to cause insanity. They would restructure their daily
regimen to include harmony and balance, achieved by exercise or some
form of interaction with nature."5 Facilities like Danville allowed local officials and physicians to direct their ill charges to a better situation than they could offer.
 |
| Vintage image of a Danville ward. (Courtesy Thomas Industries) |
When Kate arrived at Danville, she was underweight and malnourished,
likely from the rigors of pregnancy and the lack of nutritious food
borne of her poverty.6 Clearly, any form of treatment she had been given
locally in Scranton, Pennsylvania—if any—did not measure up to her needs. As a patient she benefited from shift in thinking that occurred during her life about the treatment of those with mental illness.
While Kate ultimately did not recover from her illness—she died of pneumonia in 1881—she was spared a worse fate by being sent to Danville.7 How would she have fared had she been forced to live in a jail or poorhouse simply because her family could not help her and there was nowhere else to go? Would she have received any treatment at all? Would she have suffered even more? I'm grateful for the small mercy that she was sent to Danville and received the best treatment known at that time.
I had never really looked at Kate's situation in the larger context of how it fit into the American story. In addition to dates, places, and important events, American history is also about movements, cultural changes, and shifts in thinking. In this way, Kate's experience, though tragic, is part of that American story.
To read more about Catherine "Kate" Ryan Gilbride, see these other posts:
Until next time...
© Nancy Gilbride Casey, 2026. All rights reserved.
All images used with permission of Thomas Industries, except Bedlam illustration from rawpixel.com.
NOTES
5 Ibid.
6 Catharine Gilbride patient record, 1887-1881, Record Group 23, Records
of the Department of Public Welfare, Danville State Hospital, Female Case Books, Book A,
page 81; photocopies supplied by
Pennsylvania State Archives, Harrisburg, PA to Nancy Gilbride Casey,
Tioga, Texas.
7 City of Scranton (Pennsylvania), Board of Health, death certificate for Catharine Gilbride, 27 Jan 1881; imaged,
"Record of deaths, 1878-1905, in the city of Scranton, Pennsylvania,"
FamilySearch, (
https://www.familysearch.org/en/search/catalog/koha:707274 : accessed 26 February 2026); citing Bureau of Health, Scranton.
A few of my hubby's ancestors were in these kinds of humane facilities, often not for mental illness but for chronic illnesses that required long-term rest and care in a calming environment.
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to learn more about the Moral Treatment movement. And we can see the pendulum swung back the other way to deinstitutionalize folks later. I wonder how Kate would have received treatment today? Thanks for reading/commenting.
DeleteBonjour Nancy. Merci de faire de la place aux femmes dans tes travaux généalogiques. N’oublions surtout pas toutes ces mères de familles nombreuses à qui des moyens contraceptifs n’avaient pas encore donné la liberté d’enfanter. Lorsque le mari était aux champs, à la guerre ou malade, elle s’occupaient des enfants et de la ferme. J’aurais aussi aimé leur parler, les aider. Bonne continuation. Cousin Daniel de Belgique
ReplyDeleteTu as tout à fait raison, Daniel ! Tant de femmes ont eu tant d'enfants, et c'est encore plus triste quand elles en ont perdu plusieurs à la naissance ou très jeunes. L'une de mes arrière-grands-mères a eu 11 enfants, mais seuls 5 ont survécu jusqu'à l'âge adulte, dont ma grand-mère. Quelle tristesse elles ont dû ressentir, et pourtant elles ont continué à vivre ! Merci d'avoir lu et commenté, Daniel.
DeleteTraduit avec DeepL.com (version gratuite)
I have also found a few in asylums, so sad. Good research and beautifully written.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much, Gwen. Have you written about your family who were institutionalized? It's fascinating research to be sure. I especially wanted to document Kate's story because our family knew virtually nothing about her. I felt an obligation to get the story out there. Thanks for reading and commenting.
DeleteGreat research into Danville. Very informative information of something I hadn't learned of, the Moral Treatment. I love learning new things and will look more into this. Was she there for mental illness (did you actually view her records); many asylums back in the day weren't necessarily for what we may think? :)
ReplyDeleteYes, I do have her Danville patient records. She was diagnosed with puerperal mania after a stillbirth, which we probably would call bipolar disease today. The records note her treatments and condition periodically. Check out the footnotes in part IV for resources on Dr. Kirkbride. It's linked at the end of this post. Thanks for reading.
Delete